The four deterministic views of one .gram file · r0
Archived revision r0, recorded 2026-10-14T07:58:14.270Z. Current page: Document views and the shared record vocabulary.
One source, several useful views
Section titled “One source, several useful views”A .gram file remains the canonical source. Core resolves it with a purpose-specific template; the Viewer renders the resulting ResolvedView/1. The four built-in templates are Project Tracker, Journal, Operations and Knowledge, not separate documents to maintain. Core resolves eligibility deterministically from source records, fields and explicit signals. AI records source facts; it does not invent a screen or write a ViewSpec.
Match the source structure to the work
Section titled “Match the source structure to the work”- Project Tracker organizes tasks, goals, progress and risks. Set each task
xonly when its status is sourced; otherwise leavexunset and the projection reportsunknown. Link every task to its goal. Progress countscompletedanddoneas completed andsuperseded,cancelledandcanceledasclosed_other, with all other or absent statuses in the open total; an unsourced task status still displays asunknown. Goals tally only tasks explicitly linked to them. - Journal: prefer
eventrecords withat; dated headings still work as separate heading-derived entries, not event records. For a sourced past fact, submit it now and use revisioneffective_atonly for when that fact took effect—not to fabricate a past revision. - Operations eligibility requires a
risk, a datedevent, and at least onesystem,serviceorcomponent; risks need sourcedxstatus. An incident needs an explicitly linked event with anincident,outageorfailuretag. A verified recovery needs arecovery,restoredorrestorationevent linked to the risk and asupportsorimplementsrelation to an evidence record. Metrics recordvalue,unitandobserved, but are not an Operations component or eligibility signal. - Knowledge brings events and relationships together with both event and revision history, for evidence-rich development or research narratives.
Three distinct time axes
Section titled “Three distinct time axes”Do not collapse event time, knowledge time and recording time:
- Event time comes only from event
at, taskdueor metricobserved, as appropriate. Missing dates are undated;recorded_atnever fills them in. A dated section heading is its own heading-derivedentries[]signal, not a record event. - Knowledge time is the selected revision's
effective_at, or unknown when absent. It answers what the file represented as true at that effective point; no date is inferred. - Recorded time is the revision's
recorded_at. It supports reviewing when the document itself changed.
Evidence, unknown state and honest empty views
Section titled “Evidence, unknown state and honest empty views”Displayed states require explicit source evidence and retain links to their basis. A risk is open only with explicit x of open, active or blocked; absent or unsupported status is unknown. Event content alone does not prove an incident. A recovery assertion without its linked evidence is not verified. Live health cannot be inferred from a record or metric: it remains unknown; an observation time may be shown as “last observed,” not as current health. If a status or relationship lacks evidence, show unknown rather than guessing.
Widgets with no supporting data are omitted; the view reports missing requirements where applicable rather than filling the space with invented values. A missing metric is not zero, and a missing event date is not a revision date.
How recommendations work
Section titled “How recommendations work”Core resolves the selected .gram and template through the embedded ViewSpec/1, returning ResolvedView/1; the Viewer renders only that result and does not re-interpret filters, sorting, grouping, aggregates or limits. Eligibility and recommendations are deterministic, evidence-based and model/network-free, with stable ties and explicit missing requirements. Users can select any built-in template in the Viewer regardless of recommendation.
Canonical contract
Section titled “Canonical contract”These behaviors follow thegram-format/spec/projection.md: “ProjectionResult/1”, “Evidence-based state”, “View resolution and ViewSpec/1”, “Dated section entries”, and the optional status_counts and progress conventions. The specification defines event_time from at/due/observed, knowledge_time from revision effective_at, and recorded_time from recorded_at; it also requires basis record IDs for derived claims and says empty evidence must not be presented as verified.
Evidence
Section titled “Evidence”This article summarizes the canonical projection contract, not a claim about service deployment or availability.
Source and renderer evidence
- Canonical source SHA-256
dd469c194d96bf48d4ab911acc91ec5f4f07f9f0c4ca34cf1a0fa17b68cfbb6c- Selected revision
r0 · sha256:5fd4ba302a99563536232a3776c4a373b3089c541d1eb098f2a9776aed015488- Local renderer
configured local Thegram renderer · API thegram-web-render/1- Core source
git+https://github.com/clab-one/thegram-format.git?rev=b16489e1d0d77d38f82d2f61776524737aa31557#b16489e1d0d77d38f82d2f61776524737aa31557
Canonical source: 0.gram